Knightriders (1981)

 Knightriders (1981) 145m 

Not the feature version of that TV show about the crime-fighter and his talking car, although it does sound just as silly in summary: A performance  troupe in modern-day America motorcycles from town to town in full mediaeval  regalia and stages combat with each other. This would be an odd choice for  any director, but is certainly out of character for George A. Romero, who until this point was known only for his popular (though heavily cult-bound)  horror films. I guess because it is so out of character that we have to  assume that this was a personal project of the director's - the film he  always 'wanted' to make.

Ed Harris is the self-appointed king of the motorcyclists, but there is a  pretender to the throne (Romero's favorite makeup artist Tom Savini, who  really looks the part as Morgan) who has more progressive ideas for the  troupe. The twist is that the microcosm - or microkingdom - of the  traveling players is unconsciously playing out the last days of Camelot,  chivalry, and the whole Arthurian mythos. Harris is a throwback to an  outmoded (and erroneous) notion of knights in shining armor - much like the  legendary Arthur his world is overtaken by science (technology/machines) and  reason (commerce/business).

His romantic milieu is breaking down, and its  conflicts are plain to see - half of the troupe is named after tales of  Arthur and Robin Hood while the other half is nondescript and ordinary; his  minstrels are drowned out by disco music; dangerous weapons are  indistinguishable from props; one half of his men must replay battles  against the other, again and again; and of course his knights ride  motorcycles instead of horses. 

I have the feeling that this latter point  was the main inspiration behind Romero's film (it dominated the film's  advertising) and that the paradoxical image of knights jousting on  motorcycles was of more interest to him that any desire to rework mediaeval  mythology. Unfortunately, it's only when Romero is aware of what he's up to  that the film has its clunkiest moments - Harris' dialogue may be in keeping  with his character, but if that's so, then his character isn't inspiring,  just drippy (his scenes with Merlin, for example). In fact any scenes where  the characters address each other as 'my liege' or 'my king', or act as if  they are bound to their artificial world are the ones that are least  effective - whenever there's a conflict or confrontation we wonder whether  it's based on personal issues or some wider concept inherited from the roles  they have collectively locked themselves into. 

By the end we're ready to  believe Harris should step down as king only because he's been playing the  role too long and should just get back in step with the times. Issues like these are not the heart of KNIGHTRIDERS, however, and the drawcard for many theatregoers in 1981 would have been the expertly handled  action sequences - it didn't hurt that these would have cashed in on the MAD  MAX films that were also around at the time. 

Abrupt conclusion to film  pretty much denies all the naiveté that underpins its central idea. An  unusual assortment of music helps this look like a product of the  mid-seventies. Actually, it could also be read as a palimpsest about the  end of the 1960s, under the more obvious Arthurian analogy - these guys come  across more as burnt-out hippies than historical role-players. Watch for  horror writer (and friend of Romero's) Stephen King in a cameo as a  spectator. 

From: Shane Burridge <sburridge@hotmail.com

From Newsgroups


This page was last updated 02 Dec 2002

©Copyright Info